Projects Requiring EIA: Government projects, Private projects
Abridged Assessments: Yes
Abridged Assessments Detail: "Class Assessments" are a streamlined EA process to assess the potential environmental, economic, social, cultural, or health effects of a specified category or group of reviewable projects. This practice does not seem to be fully developed or implemented in British Columbia. See EA Act, sec. 34; EAO User Guide, sec. 1.5.3 ("Typically, a class assessment is applied to routine or recurring projects that are well-defined, with anticipated impacts that are predictable or well understood, and relatively easily managed through standard mitigation measures.")
Best Practices in Lieu of EIA: No
Who Conducts Screening: Government
Who Conducts Screening Detail: See Reviewable Projects Regulation (available at https://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/243_2019)
Criteria for Screening: List or appendix of project or activity types, Proposed project or activity may cause significant environmental impact
Criteria for Screening Detail: Projects that are subject to environmental assessment are listed in the Reviewable Projects Regulation (available at https://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/243_2019). Also, the minister may by designate a proposed project as reviewable if the impacts are comparable to listed reviewable projects or if the project could have effects on an Indigenous nation and the rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 198. EA Act, secs. 11, 12.
Who Prepares EIA: Project Proponent (with or without contractor)
Who Prepares EIA Detail: The EA Act is not entirely clear, but it appears that the project proponent is responsible for preparing an application, which includes the environmental assessment. See also EAO User Guide, sec. 8.1 ("The proponent is responsible for preparing their Application as instructed in the Process Order but will engage the EAO, participating Indigenous nations, and Advisory Committee members to provide feedback during application development.")
Who Pays for EIA: Project Proponents
Who Pays for EIA Detail: EA Act, sec. 47.
EIA Contractor Qualifications: No
Conflict of Interest: No
Terms of Reference: Yes
Terms of Reference Detail: The TOR is called a "process order" and is described in sec. 19(2) of the EA Act.
Days for Decision Maker Review: 180 days (150 days + 30 days after referral to Minister)
Automatic Approval: No
Written Decision: Yes
Written Decision Detail: Ministers issue an Environmental Assessment Certificate. EA Act, sec. 29(4)
Authority to Impose Conditions: Yes
Authority to Impose Conditions Detail: The Ministers must "issue an environmental assessment certificate to the proponent and attach any conditions to the certificate that the ministers consider necessary, including, without limitation, conditions respecting payments to be made for initiatives to mitigate effects of the project." EA Act, sec. 29(4)
Expiry of Decision: Up to 10 years
Expiry of Decision Detail: EA Act. sec. 30.
Financial Assurances or Bond: Sometimes
Financial Assurances or Bond Detail: The environmental assessment certificate may include "conditions to the certificate that the ministers consider necessary, including, without limitation, conditions respecting payments to be made for initiatives to mitigate effects of the project." EA Act, sec. 29(4).