{"id":2922,"date":"2013-05-30T17:53:27","date_gmt":"2013-05-31T01:53:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/paraguay-ia-court-hr-case-yakye-axa-indigenous-community-v-paraguay-june-15-2005-english-ver\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:44:58","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:44:58","slug":"paraguay-ia-court-hr-case-yakye-axa-indigenous-community-v-paraguay-june-15-2005-english-ver","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/paraguay-ia-court-hr-case-yakye-axa-indigenous-community-v-paraguay-june-15-2005-english-ver","title":{"rendered":"Paraguay \u2014 Tribunal I\/A HR, Affaire Communaut\u00e9 autochtone Yakye Axa c. Paraguay (15 juin 2005) (version anglaise)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Veuillez cliquer sur le lien .pdf pour acc\u00e9der au document.<\/p>\n<p>(r\u00e9sum\u00e9 ci-dessous)<\/p>\n<p>La Cour a estim\u00e9 que le Paraguay n&#039;avait pas adopt\u00e9 de mesures ad\u00e9quates pour garantir que son droit interne garantisse l&#039;utilisation et la jouissance effectives par la communaut\u00e9 de ses terres traditionnelles, mena\u00e7ant ainsi le libre d\u00e9veloppement et la transmission de sa culture et de ses pratiques traditionnelles. La Cour a \u00e9galement conclu que le Paraguay avait viol\u00e9 les droits \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 et \u00e0 la protection judiciaire, ainsi que le droit \u00e0 la vie, puisqu&#039;il avait emp\u00each\u00e9 la communaut\u00e9 d&#039;acc\u00e9der \u00e0 ses moyens de subsistance traditionnels. En outre, la Cour a compris que l&#039;\u00c9tat n&#039;avait pas adopt\u00e9 les mesures positives n\u00e9cessaires pour garantir que la communaut\u00e9 vivait dans des conditions dignes pendant la p\u00e9riode o\u00f9 elle a d\u00fb se passer de ses terres. Alors qu&#039;ils restaient au bord d&#039;une route en face des terres qu&#039;ils revendiquaient, la communaut\u00e9 n&#039;avait pas un acc\u00e8s ad\u00e9quat \u00e0 la nourriture, aux services de sant\u00e9 et \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9ducation. Seize personnes sont mortes \u00e0 cause de ces conditions de vie. La Cour a conclu que l\u2019\u00c9tat avait l\u2019obligation d\u2019adopter des mesures positives en faveur d\u2019une vie digne, en particulier lorsque les groupes vuln\u00e9rables \u00e0 haut risque \u00e9taient en jeu, dont la protection est devenue une priorit\u00e9. La Cour a ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#039;\u00c9tat de d\u00e9limiter les terres traditionnelles, de les soumettre gratuitement \u00e0 la communaut\u00e9 et de fournir les biens et services de base n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 la survie de la communaut\u00e9 jusqu&#039;\u00e0 ce qu&#039;elle r\u00e9cup\u00e8re ses terres. &nbsp;<br \/>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Please click on the .pdf link to access the document. (summary below) The Court considered Paraguay had failed to adopt adequate measures to ensure its domestic law guaranteed the community&#39;s effective use and enjoyment of their traditional land, thus threatening the free development and transmission of its culture and traditional practices.&nbsp; The Court also concluded [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[241,75],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[],"region":[541],"class_list":["post-2922","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-ilo-169","resource-topic-indigenous-peoples","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","region-south-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/2922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=2922"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=2922"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=2922"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=2922"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=2922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}