{"id":2569,"date":"2013-05-30T18:19:02","date_gmt":"2013-05-31T02:19:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/canada-daishowa-inc-v-friends-lubicon-39-or-3d-620-1998414-ontario-supreme-court\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:44:17","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:44:17","slug":"canada-daishowa-inc-v-friends-lubicon-39-or-3d-620-1998414-ontario-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/canada-daishowa-inc-v-friends-lubicon-39-or-3d-620-1998414-ontario-supreme-court","title":{"rendered":"Canada \u2014 Daishowa Inc. c. Amis du Lubicon, 39 OR (3d) 620 (1998.4.14) (Cour supr\u00eame de l&#039;Ontario)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Institut canadien d\u2019information juridique \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onsc\/doc\/1998\/1998canlii14828\/1998canlii14828.html\" title=\"Daishowa, Inc. c. Amis du Lubicon\">http:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onsc\/doc\/1998\/1998canlii14828\/1998canlii14828.html<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Institut canadien d&#039;information juridique \u2013 http:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onsc\/doc\/1998\/1998canlii14828\/1998canlii14828.html<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[74],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[],"region":[638,539],"class_list":["post-2569","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-human-rights","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","region-canada","region-north-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/2569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2569"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=2569"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=2569"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=2569"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=2569"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=2569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}