{"id":2536,"date":"2013-05-30T18:31:17","date_gmt":"2013-05-31T02:31:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/india-jagpal-singh-others-versus-state-of-punjab-others-civil-appeal-1132-2011-2011-01-28-supreme-court-of-india-public-trust-doctrine-judgment-requiring-eviction-of-encroachers-of-a-vi\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:44:08","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:44:08","slug":"india-jagpal-singh-others-versus-state-of-punjab-others-civil-appeal-1132-2011-2011-01-28-supreme-court-of-india-public-trust-doctrine-judgment-requiring-eviction-of-encroachers-of-a-vi","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/india-jagpal-singh-others-versus-state-of-punjab-others-civil-appeal-1132-2011-2011-01-28-supreme-court-of-india-public-trust-doctrine-judgment-requiring-eviction-of-encroachers-of-a-vi","title":{"rendered":"Inde \u2014 Jagpal Singh et autres contre l'\u00c9tat du Pendjab et autres, appel civil 1132\/2011 (2011.01.28) (Cour supr\u00eame de l'Inde) (Doctrine de la confiance publique) (Jugement exigeant l'expulsion des envahisseurs d'un \u00e9tang de village)"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[98],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[],"region":[542],"class_list":["post-2536","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-public-trust-doctrine","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","region-south-asia"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/2536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2536"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=2536"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=2536"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=2536"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=2536"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=2536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}