{"id":17555,"date":"2020-12-02T16:08:35","date_gmt":"2020-12-03T00:08:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/orgao-especial-do-tribunal-de-justica-de-sao-paulo-adi-0121480-62-2011-8-26-0000-rel-arantes-theodoro-october-1-2014\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:42:55","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:42:55","slug":"br_saopaulo_1oct2014","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/br_saopaulo_1oct2014","title":{"rendered":"\u00d3rg\u00e3o Especial do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de S\u00e3o Paulo, ADI 0121480-62.2011.8.26.0000, Rel. Arantes Th\u00e9odoro (1er octobre 2014)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span ><strong><span >\u00d3rg\u00e3o Especial do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de S\u00e3o Paulo, ADI 0121480-62.2011.8.26.0000, Rel. Arantes Th\u00e9odoro (1er octobre 2014)<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span ><span >La municipalit\u00e9 de Sao Paulo a adopt\u00e9 une loi (Lei Municipal 15.374\/2011) interdisant la distribution (gratuite ou \u00e0 vendre) de sacs en plastique aux clients dans le but d&#039;emballer ou de transporter des marchandises acquises dans les \u00e9tablissements commerciaux de la ville et encourageant leur utilisation. de sacs r\u00e9utilisables.&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span ><span >Loi municipale 15.374\/2011\u00a0: <a href=\"https:\/\/app-plpconsulta-prd.azurewebsites.net\/Forms\/MostrarArquivo?ID=4973&amp;TipArq=1\" >https:\/\/app-plpconsulta-prd.azurewebsites.net\/Forms\/MostrarArquivo?ID=4973&#038;TipArq=1<\/a> (en portugais)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span ><span >En octobre 2014, la Cour constitutionnelle de l&#039;\u00c9tat a rejet\u00e9 un proc\u00e8s intent\u00e9 par une entit\u00e9 repr\u00e9sentant l&#039;industrie plastique de l&#039;\u00c9tat de Sao Paulo (Sindicato da Ind\u00fastria de Material Pl\u00e1stico do Estado de S\u00e3o Paulo), qui affirmait que l&#039;interdiction municipale des sacs en plastique violait l&#039;\u00c9tat. constitution parce qu&#039;il s&#039;agissait d&#039;un exercice d&#039;autorit\u00e9 appartenant uniquement aux gouvernements f\u00e9d\u00e9ral et \u00e9tatique (entre autres arguments constitutionnels), et a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que les constitutions f\u00e9d\u00e9rale et \u00e9tatique accordent aux municipalit\u00e9s le pouvoir de l\u00e9gif\u00e9rer sur les questions d&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eat local (telles que la gestion des d\u00e9chets solides) et d&#039;imposer \u00e0 tous les gouvernements (y compris les municipalit\u00e9s) le devoir de prot\u00e9ger l\u2019environnement. Voir \u00d3rg\u00e3o Especial do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de S\u00e3o Paulo, ADI 0121480-62.2011.8.26.0000, Rel. Arantes Theodoro (1er octobre 2014), disponible sur : <a href=\"http:\/\/tj-sp.jusbrasil.com.br\/jurisprudencia\/146500347\/direta-de-inconstitucionalidade-adi-1214806220118260000-sp-0121480-6220118260000\/inteiro-teor-146500355\" >http:\/\/tj-sp.jusbrasil.com.br\/jurisprudencia\/146500347\/direta-de-inconstitucionalidade-adi-1214806220118260000-sp-0121480-6220118260000\/inteiro-teor-146500355<\/a> (en portugais).<\/span><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00d3rg\u00e3o Especial do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de S\u00e3o Paulo, ADI 0121480-62.2011.8.26.0000, Rel. Arantes Theodoro (October 1, 2014) The Municipality of Sao Paulo passed a law (Lei Municipal 15.374\/2011) prohibiting the distribution (for free or for sale) of plastic bags to customers for the purposes of packaging or transporting merchandise acquired in commercial establishments in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[1989],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30105],"region":[669,541],"class_list":["post-17555","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-plastic","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-plastic","region-brazil","region-south-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/17555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=17555"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=17555"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=17555"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=17555"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=17555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}