{"id":12662,"date":"2016-11-15T14:32:47","date_gmt":"2016-11-15T22:32:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/border-power-plant-working-group-v-department-energy-260-f-supp-2d-997-sd-cal-2003\/"},"modified":"2025-05-06T09:52:29","modified_gmt":"2025-05-06T17:52:29","slug":"border-power-plant-working-group-v-department-energy-260-f-supp-2d-997-sd-cal-2003","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/border-power-plant-working-group-v-department-energy-260-f-supp-2d-997-sd-cal-2003","title":{"rendered":"Groupe de travail sur les centrales \u00e9lectriques frontali\u00e8res c. Minist\u00e8re de l&#039;\u00c9nergie, 260 F. Supp. 2d 997 (SD Cal.2003)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans l\u2019affaire Border Power Plant Working Group c. Department of Energy, les plaignants ont contest\u00e9 l\u2019\u00e9valuation environnementale (\u00c9E) pr\u00e9par\u00e9e pour les permis et les emprises requis pour construire des lignes de transport d\u2019\u00e9lectricit\u00e9. 260 F. Supp. 2d 997, 1006 (SD Cal. 2003). Les lignes de transport transporteraient l\u2019\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 produite par des centrales \u00e9lectriques au gaz de l\u2019autre c\u00f4t\u00e9 de la fronti\u00e8re, du Mexique \u00e0 la Californie. Dans une ordonnance accordant en partie et rejetant en partie les requ\u00eates en jugement sommaire, un tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral de district a jug\u00e9 l&#039;\u00e9valuation environnementale inad\u00e9quate dans son analyse des impacts environnementaux des lignes de transport d&#039;\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 propos\u00e9es, en partie parce qu&#039;elle n&#039;avait pas analys\u00e9 l&#039;importance de l&#039;augmentation du dioxyde de carbone. \u00e9missions g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9es par les centrales \u00e9lectriques fournissant de l\u2019\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 qui serait transport\u00e9e sur les lignes. Identifiant. au 1028-1029. Par la suite, le minist\u00e8re de l\u2019\u00c9nergie a pr\u00e9par\u00e9 une EIE, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9e ad\u00e9quate dans l\u2019affaire Border Power Plant Working Group c. Minist\u00e8re de l\u2019\u00c9nergie. 467 F. Supp. 2d 1040, 1070 (SD Cal. 2006).<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Border Power Plant Working Group v. Department of Energy, the plaintiffs challenged the environmental assessment (EA) prepared for required permits and rights-of-way to build electricity transmission lines. 260 F. Supp. 2d 997, 1006 (S.D. Cal. 2003). The transmission lines would carry electricity generated from gas-fired power plants across the border from Mexico to California. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[43,190,203,61,199,62],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30102],"region":[539,642],"class_list":["post-12662","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-climate-change","resource-topic-coal-and-gas-power-plants","resource-topic-cumulative-impacts","resource-topic-energy","resource-topic-enforcement","resource-topic-environmental-impact-assessment","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-coal","region-north-america","region-united-states-of-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/12662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=12662"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=12662"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=12662"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=12662"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=12662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}