AF Akpan c. Royal Dutch Shell, plc
\nE. Dooh c. Royal Dutch Shell, plc
\nFA Oguru c. Royal Dutch Shell plc<\/p>\n
Cour d'appel de La Haye (18 d\u00e9cembre 2015)<\/p>\n
Les agriculteurs nig\u00e9rians et les Amis de la Terre ont port\u00e9 plainte contre Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) et ses filiales nig\u00e9rianes devant un tribunal n\u00e9erlandais pour obtenir une indemnisation pour les dommages qui auraient \u00e9t\u00e9 caus\u00e9s par la fuite d'ol\u00e9oducs et d'un puits de p\u00e9trole au Nigeria. Annulant une d\u00e9cision d'un tribunal inf\u00e9rieur, la Cour d'appel de La Haye a jug\u00e9 que les tribunaux n\u00e9erlandais \u00e9taient comp\u00e9tents pour examiner les demandes. Il a \u00e9galement ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 Shell de donner aux plaignants acc\u00e8s aux documents relatifs aux d\u00e9versements de p\u00e9trole. <\/p>\n
Les avis, en n\u00e9erlandais, sont accessibles aux liens suivants\u00a0:<\/p>\n
http:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3586 (Dooh)<\/a> A.F. Akpan v. Royal Dutch Shell, plc E. Dooh v. Royal Dutch Shell, plc F.A. Oguru v. Royal Dutch Shell plc Court of Appeal of the Hague (December 18, 2015) Nigerian farmers and Friends of the Earth filed cases against Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) and its Nigerian subsidiaries in a Dutch court seeking compensation for damage […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[35,63,91],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30103],"region":[766,544],"class_list":["post-12329","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-access-to-justice","resource-topic-environmental-justice","resource-topic-oil-gas","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-notable-cases","region-netherlands","region-western-europe"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/12329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=12329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nhttp:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3587 <\/a>; (Akpan)
\nhttp:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3588 (Oguru)<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"