{"id":12304,"date":"2016-06-16T13:18:43","date_gmt":"2016-06-16T21:18:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/controversia-constitucional-652013-actor-municipo-de-chapala-estado-de-jalisco-1\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:43:28","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:43:28","slug":"controversia-constitucional-652013-actor-municipo-de-chapala-estado-de-jalisco-1","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resource\/controversia-constitucional-652013-actor-municipo-de-chapala-estado-de-jalisco-1","title":{"rendered":"Controversia Constitucional 65\/2013 (Acteur : Municipo de Chapala, Estado de Jalisco)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Controversia Constitucional 65\/2013 (Acteur : Municipo de Chapala, Estado de Jalisco) (17 f\u00e9vrier 2013)<sup>&nbsp;<\/sup>2014)<\/p>\n<p>Le maire de Chapala a construit un brise-lames sur le lac Chapala sans obtenir de concession de la Commission nationale de l&#039;eau pour utiliser les plans d&#039;eau f\u00e9d\u00e9raux. La loi nationale sur l&#039;eau exige que les personnes physiques et morales obtiennent une concession pour pouvoir utiliser ou construire des installations sur les plans d&#039;eau f\u00e9d\u00e9raux, comme le lac Chapala.<\/p>\n<p>Suite \u00e0 cette violation, l&#039;Agence Nationale de l&#039;Eau a engag\u00e9 une proc\u00e9dure d&#039;ex\u00e9cution contre la municipalit\u00e9 de Chapala, qui a abouti \u00e0 l&#039;ordre de d\u00e9molir la digue. La municipalit\u00e9 a contest\u00e9 cette d\u00e9cision, all\u00e9guant que la Commission avait empi\u00e9t\u00e9 sur ses pouvoirs en mati\u00e8re d&#039;utilisation du sol et de zonage. La Cour constitutionnelle a d&#039;abord analys\u00e9 les pouvoirs des municipalit\u00e9s en mati\u00e8re d&#039;utilisation des terres et de zonage et a confirm\u00e9 que les municipalit\u00e9s ont le pouvoir de g\u00e9rer les questions d&#039;utilisation des terres et de zonage relevant de leur comp\u00e9tence.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour ajoute toutefois que les municipalit\u00e9s doivent exercer ce pouvoir conform\u00e9ment aux lois et r\u00e8glements f\u00e9d\u00e9raux. La Cour a estim\u00e9 que la municipalit\u00e9 de Chapala n&#039;avait pas exerc\u00e9 ses pouvoirs conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi nationale sur l&#039;eau puisqu&#039;elle n&#039;avait pas obtenu de concession pour la construction du brise-lames. Ainsi, la Cour a conclu que l&#039;Agence nationale de l&#039;eau n&#039;avait pas envahi la comp\u00e9tence de la municipalit\u00e9 et a confirm\u00e9 l&#039;ordre de d\u00e9molition du brise-lames.&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Controversia Constitucional&nbsp;65\/2013 (Actor: Municipo de Chapala, Estado de Jalisco)&nbsp;(February 17,&nbsp;2014) The mayor of Chapala built a breakwater on Lake&nbsp;Chapala without obtaining a concession from the National Water&nbsp;Commission to use federal water areas. The National Water Act requires natural and legal persons to obtain a concession in order to use or build facilities on federal water [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[84],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30103],"region":[640,539],"class_list":["post-12304","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-land-use","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-notable-cases","region-mexico","region-north-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/12304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=12304"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=12304"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=12304"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=12304"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=12304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}