{"id":19321,"date":"2023-05-23T08:16:30","date_gmt":"2023-05-23T16:16:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/halting-commercial-propagation-gmo-rice-and-eggplant-philippines\/"},"modified":"2025-02-25T16:05:34","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T00:05:34","slug":"halting-commercial-propagation-gmo-philippines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/halting-commercial-propagation-gmo-philippines","title":{"rendered":"Arr\u00eat de la propagation commerciale du riz et des aubergines OGM aux Philippines"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image stk-block-image stk-block stk-985b93f\" data-block-id=\"985b93f\"><style>.stk-985b93f .stk-img-figcaption{text-align:left !important;font-size:14px !important;font-style:italic !important;}@media screen and (max-width:999px){.stk-985b93f .stk-img-figcaption{font-size:14px !important;}}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img wp-image-53249\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353.jpg\" width=\"2400\" height=\"1353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353.jpg 2400w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-336x189.jpg 336w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-771x435.jpg 771w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-768x433.jpg 768w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-1536x866.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-2048x1155.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_2400x1353-18x10.jpg 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2400px) 100vw, 2400px\" \/><\/span><figcaption class=\"stk-img-figcaption\">Champ de riz \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 d\u2019un m\u00e9nage \u00e0 Nueva Ecija, Philippines. PHOTO : Tristan sur Unsplash.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zelda Soriano, partenaire d&#039;ELAW, du Centre d&#039;aide juridique communautaire et d&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eat public (<a href=\"https:\/\/communitylegalhelp.wordpress.com\/\">C-AIDE<\/a>) a r\u00e9cemment partag\u00e9 une nouvelle passionnante selon laquelle la Cour supr\u00eame des Philippines a \u00e9mis une ordonnance de kalikasan en r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 leur p\u00e9tition contre la propagation commerciale du riz et des aubergines OGM aux Philippines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-3370772\" data-block-id=\"3370772\"><div class=\"stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-3370772-column\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-d448b2c\" data-v=\"4\" data-block-id=\"d448b2c\"><style>@media screen and (min-width:690px){.stk-d448b2c {flex:var(--stk-flex-grow, 1) 1 calc(54.5% - var(--stk-column-gap, 0px) * 1 \/ 2 ) !important;}}<\/style><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-d448b2c-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-d448b2c-inner-blocks\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Les p\u00e9titionnaires sont un r\u00e9seau dirig\u00e9 par des agriculteurs et compos\u00e9 d&#039;organisations populaires, d&#039;ONG et de scientifiques appel\u00e9 Farmers and Scientists for Development (<a href=\"https:\/\/masipag.org\/about-masipag\/\">MASIPAG<\/a>). Repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par C-HELP, ils demandent \u00e0 la Cour d&#039;arr\u00eater la propagation commerciale du riz dor\u00e9 et de l&#039;aubergine Bt et d&#039;annuler tous les permis de bios\u00e9curit\u00e9 jusqu&#039;\u00e0 ce que des preuves de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et de conformit\u00e9 aux exigences l\u00e9gales soient pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es. Cela comprend la r\u00e9alisation d&#039;\u00e9valuations ind\u00e9pendantes des risques et des impacts, l&#039;obtention du consentement pr\u00e9alable et \u00e9clair\u00e9 des agriculteurs et des peuples autochtones et la mise en \u0153uvre de m\u00e9canismes de responsabilit\u00e9 en cas de dommages.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-22e4472 stk-block-background\" data-v=\"4\" data-block-id=\"22e4472\"><style>.stk-22e4472 {background-color:#004215 !important;}.stk-22e4472:before{background-color:#004215 !important;}@media screen and (min-width:690px){.stk-22e4472 {flex:var(--stk-flex-grow, 1) 1 calc(45.5% - var(--stk-column-gap, 0px) * 1 \/ 2 ) !important;}}<\/style><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-22e4472-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-22e4472-inner-blocks\">\n<p class=\"has-palette-color-7-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-ca48a8a4b3927ccf584620b7d994252d wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>\u00c9crit de Kalikasan<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-palette-color-7-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-155098dfa661ad52dfd0e860051569d8 wp-block-paragraph\">Une ordonnance de kalikasan est un recours juridique utilis\u00e9 aux Philippines pour invoquer le droit constitutionnel d&#039;une personne \u00e0 une \u00e9cologie \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e et saine. Il tire son mandat de l\u2019article II, section 16 de la Constitution de 1987, qui stipule que \u00ab l\u2019\u00c9tat doit prot\u00e9ger et promouvoir le droit du peuple \u00e0 une \u00e9cologie \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e et saine, en accord avec le rythme et l\u2019harmonie de la nature \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image alignleft stk-block-image has-text-align-left has-text-align-center-tablet has-text-align-center-mobile stk-block stk-bd94c6b\" data-block-id=\"bd94c6b\"><style>.stk-bd94c6b .stk-img-wrapper{width:225px !important;}@media screen and (max-width:999px){.stk-bd94c6b .stk-img-wrapper{width:300px !important;}}@media screen and (max-width:689px){.stk-bd94c6b .stk-img-wrapper{width:100% !important;}}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img wp-image-53250\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560.jpg\" width=\"1920\" height=\"2560\" srcset=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-336x448.jpg 336w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-771x1028.jpg 771w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-768x1024.jpg 768w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023_05_23_ebulletin_1920x2560-9x12.jpg 9w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/span><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le brevet du riz dor\u00e9 appartient \u00e0 Syngenta, une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 agrochimique transnationale. Les p\u00e9titionnaires se sont inqui\u00e9t\u00e9s du fait que le riz, qui contient des g\u00e8nes issus du ma\u00efs et de bact\u00e9ries permettant \u00e0 la plante de biosynth\u00e9tiser le b\u00eata-carot\u00e8ne, ne r\u00e9pondait pas aux exigences l\u00e9gales en mati\u00e8re de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les humains et l&#039;environnement. Les p\u00e9titionnaires ont soulev\u00e9 des pr\u00e9occupations similaires concernant l&#039;aubergine Bacillus thuringiensis, ou aubergine Bt, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 con\u00e7ue de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 ce que la plante elle-m\u00eame produise du Bt, une toxine destin\u00e9e \u00e0 tuer les insectes qui se nourrissent d&#039;aubergines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00ab La Cour n&#039;a pas encore rendu d&#039;ordonnance temporaire de protection de l&#039;environnement, mais des victoires progressives devraient \u00eatre c\u00e9l\u00e9br\u00e9es \u00bb, d\u00e9clare Zelda, qui ajoute :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00ab\u00a0Merci \u00e0 ELAW de nous avoir aid\u00e9 \u00e0 examiner nos arguments selon lesquels les impacts humains et \u00e9cologiques de ces cultures n&#039;ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 suffisamment \u00e9tudi\u00e9s pour garantir le respect des lois des Philippines. ELAW nous a \u00e9galement aid\u00e9 dans les recherches indispensables pour d\u00e9mystifier les affirmations incorrectes et trompeuses des personnes interrog\u00e9es selon lesquelles le riz dor\u00e9 aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 approuv\u00e9 sans r\u00e9serve pour l&#039;alimentation humaine ou animale en Australie, en Nouvelle-Z\u00e9lande, au Canada et aux \u00c9tats-Unis. C&#039;\u00e9tait important pour nous parce que les fausses informations la r\u00e9clamation produit un effet d\u2019entra\u00eenement qui pourrait influencer le jugement du tribunal. Il \u00e9tait difficile d&#039;obtenir des informations sans l&#039;aide d&#039;ELAW.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le bref de Kalikasan a ordonn\u00e9 aux d\u00e9fendeurs de d\u00e9poser leur r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la p\u00e9tition. \u00ab Nous avons contact\u00e9 le r\u00e9seau ELAW pour discuter de cas similaires d\u00e9pos\u00e9s dans d&#039;autres juridictions et sommes reconnaissants du soutien et des liens \u00e9tablis avec des experts pour renforcer nos arguments \u00e0 mesure que nous faisons avancer cette affaire \u00bb, d\u00e9clare Zelda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>En savoir plus:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cour supr\u00eame des Philippines. 19 avril 2023<br><a href=\"https:\/\/sc.judiciary.gov.ph\/sc-issues-writ-of-kalikasan-on-genetically-modified-rice-and-eggplant-products\/\">SC publie un bref de Kalikasan sur les produits \u00e0 base de riz et d&#039;aubergines g\u00e9n\u00e9tiquement modifi\u00e9s<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rappeur. 28 avril 2023<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rappler.com\/nation\/mindanao\/group-asks-local-government-take-lead-vs-genetically-modified-organism-rice-eggplant\/\">Un groupe demande aux gouvernements locaux de prendre l&#039;initiative face au riz et aux aubergines OGM<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/images_content\/news\/ebulletin\/2019\/bern_signature.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"mailto:bern@elaw.org\">Bern Johnson<\/a><br>Directeur ex\u00e9cutif<br>Alliance mondiale du droit de l&#039;environnement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Riz. PHOTO : Faris Mohammed sur Unsplash.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Cour supr\u00eame des Philippines a \u00e9mis un bref de kalikasan en r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la propagation commerciale des OGM aux Philippines.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":47189,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856],"tags":[30094],"region":[618,30247],"class_list":["post-19321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin","tag-news","region-philippines","region-southeast-asia"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19321"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56925,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19321\/revisions\/56925"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19321"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=19321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}