{"id":19319,"date":"2020-09-09T08:57:47","date_gmt":"2020-09-09T16:57:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/madras-high-court-delivers-double-blow-notorious-polluter-vedanta-sterlite\/"},"modified":"2024-12-31T11:48:15","modified_gmt":"2024-12-31T19:48:15","slug":"madras-hcourt-delivers-blow-polluter-vedanta-sterlite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/madras-hcourt-delivers-blow-polluter-vedanta-sterlite","title":{"rendered":"La Haute Cour de Madras porte un double coup au pollueur notoire Vedanta-Sterlite"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image stk-block-image stk-block stk-5661aee\" data-block-id=\"5661aee\"><style>.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:221px !important;height:295px !important}@media screen and (max-width:999px){.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:250px !important}}@media screen and (max-width:689px){.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:250px !important}}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img wp-image-52929\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-scaled.jpg\" width=\"1920\" height=\"2560\" srcset=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-scaled.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-336x448.jpg 336w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-771x1028.jpg 771w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-768x1024.jpg 768w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-9x12.jpg 9w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/span><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Haute Cour de Madras a rejet\u00e9 la demande de Sterlite Copper de rouvrir son usine dont la fermeture avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e en 2018. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l&#039;entreprise responsable d&#039;une fuite d\u00e9sastreuse de dioxyde de soufre (SO2) en 2013 qui a affect\u00e9 des milliers d&#039;habitants de Thoothukudi, une ville portuaire de l&#039;oc\u00e9an Indien. Golfe de Mannar au Tamil Nadu. Sterlite est une unit\u00e9 du conglom\u00e9rat minier mondial Vedanta Ltd. La proc\u00e9dure devant la Haute Cour a marqu\u00e9 un moment cl\u00e9 dans le long combat de la communaut\u00e9 contre Sterlite. La Haute Cour a critiqu\u00e9 Sterlite et le TNPCB pour ne pas avoir veill\u00e9 \u00e0 ce qu&#039;une zone tampon (ceinture verte) de taille ad\u00e9quate soit \u00e9tablie autour de l&#039;installation et suffisamment plant\u00e9e d&#039;arbres. Les ceintures vertes sont si importantes, selon la Cour, que les autorit\u00e9s auraient eu raison de fermer l&#039;usine de Sterlite sur la seule base de l&#039;incapacit\u00e9 de l&#039;entreprise \u00e0 maintenir une zone tampon. Plus important encore, la d\u00e9cision de la Haute Cour renforce un th\u00e8me qui traverse des d\u00e9cennies de jurisprudence indienne : l\u2019environnement doit \u00eatre prot\u00e9g\u00e9 pour les g\u00e9n\u00e9rations futures.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Haute Cour de Madras a rejet\u00e9 la demande de Sterlite Copper de rouvrir son usine, dont la fermeture avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e en 2019 en raison de probl\u00e8mes de zonage.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":52929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856],"tags":[30094],"region":[],"class_list":["post-19319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin","tag-news"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19319"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56331,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319\/revisions\/56331"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19319"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=19319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}