{"id":18960,"date":"2021-12-09T16:38:48","date_gmt":"2021-12-10T00:38:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/shell-withdraws-north-sea-cambo-project\/"},"modified":"2024-01-17T13:24:43","modified_gmt":"2024-01-17T21:24:43","slug":"shell-withdraws-north-sea-cambo-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/shell-withdraws-north-sea-cambo-project","title":{"rendered":"Shell se retire du projet Cambo en mer du Nord"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"image-centered-container\">\n<div class=\"inline-block\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/images_content\/news\/ebulletin\/2021\/2021_12_09_ebulletin_800x399.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/>\n<div class=\"text-right\"><em>PHOTO : @StopCambo<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nous avons des nouvelles fantastiques \u00e0 partager !<br>&nbsp;<br>Royal Dutch Shell a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2021\/dec\/02\/shell-pulls-out-of-cambo-oilfield-project\">retir\u00e9 du projet controvers\u00e9 du champ p\u00e9trolier de Cambo<\/a>, au large des \u00eeles Shetland. Shell poss\u00e8de le 30% de Cambo et son retrait pourrait conduire \u00e0 l&#039;arr\u00eat du projet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le Dr Heidi Weiskel, scientifique du personnel d&#039;ELAW, a examin\u00e9 l&#039;\u00e9valuation de l&#039;impact environnemental du projet \u00e0 courte vue et BBC News <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-59210899\">signal\u00e9<\/a> ses conclusions en novembre.<br>&nbsp;<br>Son rapport concluait :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00ab S&#039;il devait survenir un accident au cours des 25 ann\u00e9es d&#039;exploitation du champ, cela pourrait s&#039;av\u00e9rer d\u00e9vastateur pour de nombreuses esp\u00e8ces d&#039;invert\u00e9br\u00e9s, de poissons, de mammif\u00e8res marins et d&#039;oiseaux marins qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 trouv\u00e9es dans la zone du projet. Cela pourrait nuire davantage aux r\u00e9seaux trophiques p\u00e9lagiques et c\u00f4tiers dans les eaux environnantes, non seulement au Royaume-Uni, mais aussi dans les pays voisins qui n&#039;ont pas accept\u00e9 ce niveau de risque pour leurs ressources biologiques et dont les citoyens et les gouvernements ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficient pas du projet. \u00bb<br>&nbsp;<br>Tessa Khan, directrice de <a href=\"https:\/\/upliftuk.org\/\">Soul\u00e8vement<\/a> dit:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00ab C&#039;est la fin pour Cambo. Shell a vu ce qui se passait. Leur d\u00e9claration montre clairement que les milieux \u00e9conomiques s\u2019opposent \u00e0 de nouveaux d\u00e9veloppements p\u00e9troliers et gaziers. Mais c\u2019est la pression publique et politique g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e qui a rendu Cambo intenable. Il est d\u00e9sormais largement admis qu&#039;il ne peut y avoir de nouveaux projets p\u00e9troliers et gaziers nulle part si nous voulons maintenir un climat s\u00fbr.\u00bb<br>&nbsp;<br>Les plans de d\u00e9veloppement du champ p\u00e9trolier pr\u00e9voyaient la construction d&#039;un pipeline pour exporter du gaz du Royaume-Uni qui traverserait la ceinture d&#039;\u00e9ponges des F\u00e9ro\u00e9-Shetland, une zone marine prot\u00e9g\u00e9e du Royaume-Uni. ELAW a travaill\u00e9 avec Uplift pour examiner les plans du projet propos\u00e9.<br>&nbsp;<br>Merci \u00e0 Uplift et aux nombreuses organisations au Royaume-Uni et dans le monde qui ont rendu cette victoire possible !<br>&nbsp;<br>Trouvez plus d\u2019informations dans ce qui suit :<br>&nbsp;<br>Le Gardien, 2\/12\/21<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2021\/dec\/02\/shell-pulls-out-of-cambo-oilfield-project\">Shell se retire du projet p\u00e9trolier de Cambo<\/a><br>&nbsp;<br>Bulletin ELAW, 23\/11\/21<br><a href=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/protecting-ocean-habitat\/\">Prot\u00e9ger l&#039;habitat oc\u00e9anique<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image stk-block-image has-text-align-left stk-block stk-4160f75\" data-block-id=\"4160f75\"><style>.stk-4160f75 .stk-img-wrapper{width:175px !important}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/images_content\/news\/ebulletin\/signatures\/bern_signature.jpg\" width=\"175\" height=\"300\"\/><\/span><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><p><a href=\"mailto:bern@elaw.org\">Bern Johnson<\/a><br>Directeur ex\u00e9cutif<br>Alliance mondiale du droit de l&#039;environnement<\/p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Royal Dutch Shell s&#039;est retir\u00e9 du projet controvers\u00e9 du champ p\u00e9trolier de Cambo, au large des \u00eeles Shetland.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":47151,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856],"tags":[30094],"region":[775,544],"class_list":["post-18960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin","tag-news","region-united-kingdom","region-western-europe"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18960"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18960\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51874,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18960\/revisions\/51874"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47151"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18960"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=18960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}