{"id":13739,"date":"2017-11-15T11:27:03","date_gmt":"2017-11-15T19:27:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/people-vs-arctic\/"},"modified":"2024-01-03T14:11:40","modified_gmt":"2024-01-03T22:11:40","slug":"people-vs-arctic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/people-vs-arctic","title":{"rendered":"Le peuple contre l\u2019Arctique"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image stk-block-image stk-block stk-0a08fd8\" data-block-id=\"0a08fd8\"><style>.stk-0a08fd8 .stk-img-figcaption{font-size:14px !important;font-style:italic !important;text-align:left !important}@media screen and (max-width:999px){.stk-0a08fd8 .stk-img-figcaption{font-size:14px !important}}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/images_content\/news\/ebulletin\/2017\/2017_11_15_ebulletin.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"300\"\/><\/span><figcaption class=\"stk-img-figcaption\">Plateformes p\u00e9troli\u00e8res et gazi\u00e8res dans les champs p\u00e9trolif\u00e8res de la mer du Nord en Norv\u00e8ge, Wikimedia Commons, \u00d8yvind Knoph Askeland<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/norway\/no\/\">Association nordique de Greenpeace<\/a> et <a href=\"https:\/\/nu.no\/\">Nature et humanit\u00e9<\/a> (Nature &amp; Youth) sont devant le tribunal de district d&#039;Oslo, en Norv\u00e8ge, pour demander cette semaine au tribunal d&#039;annuler les projets d&#039;exploration p\u00e9troli\u00e8re dans l&#039;Arctique. Ils soutiennent que le gouvernement n\u2019a pas suffisamment pris en compte les impacts climatiques de la d\u00e9cision d\u2019octroi de licences et la mani\u00e8re dont ces impacts porteront atteinte au droit constitutionnel fondamental de chaque personne, y compris les g\u00e9n\u00e9rations futures, \u00e0 un environnement sain, y compris un climat vivable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ELAW a soumis une <a href=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/system\/files\/attachments\/publicresource\/ELAW_Norway_Amicus_30Oct2017.pdf\/\">M\u00e9moire d&#039;Amicus Curiae<\/a> pour appuyer les arguments des plaignants. \u00c0 travers ce m\u00e9moire, ELAW partage avec la Cour une jurisprudence importante provenant de cours et tribunaux \u00e9trangers qui ont statu\u00e9 sur des questions similaires \u00e0 celles soulev\u00e9es par les plaignants. Le m\u00e9moire souligne \u00e9galement d&#039;importantes lacunes dans les informations fournies aux d\u00e9cideurs dans le cadre de l&#039;analyse environnementale qui a constitu\u00e9 la base de la d\u00e9cision d&#039;octroi de licence.<br>&nbsp;<br>Pour plus d&#039;informations, consultez :<br>&nbsp;<br>Al Jazeera, 11 novembre 2017<br><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/indepth\/opinion\/suing-norway-climate-change-oil-drilling-171110172034317.html\">Pourquoi nous poursuivons le gouvernement norv\u00e9gien<\/a><br>&nbsp;<br>Reuters, 13 novembre 2017<br><a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-climatechange-accord-lawsuit\/seeking-to-slow-climate-change-lawsuits-look-to-the-constitution-idUSKBN1DD1C7\">Pour ralentir le changement climatique, les poursuites se tournent vers la constitution<\/a><br>&nbsp;<br>Jennifer Gleason<br>Avocat du personnel d&#039;ELAW &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Apprenez-en davantage sur notre travail et comment vous pouvez <a href=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/give\/\">Soutenir ELAW<\/a> en visitant notre <a href=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/\">site web<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/elaw.org\/\">Facebook<\/a>, et <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ELAWUS\">Twitter<\/a>. &nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&#039;Association nordique de Greenpeace et Natur og Ungdom (Nature et jeunesse) sont cette semaine devant le tribunal de district d&#039;Oslo, en Norv\u00e8ge, pour demander au tribunal d&#039;annuler les projets d&#039;exploration p\u00e9troli\u00e8re dans l&#039;Arctique.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":46989,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856],"tags":[30094],"region":[767,544],"class_list":["post-13739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin","tag-news","region-norway","region-western-europe"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13739"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51035,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13739\/revisions\/51035"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13739"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=13739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}