{"id":34677,"date":"2023-07-14T12:36:13","date_gmt":"2023-07-14T20:36:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/?page_id=34677"},"modified":"2025-12-22T15:21:42","modified_gmt":"2025-12-22T23:21:42","slug":"resources","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/fr\/resources","title":{"rendered":"Ressources"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/span>
\n

Resources for Advocates<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Legal & Scientific Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Resource Topic<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Resource Type<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Resource Category<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Region & Country<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
Filter<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

Sort By<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
Climate Emergency and Human Rights, Advisory Opinion AO 32\/25, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) No. 32 (May 29, 2025)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n Caribbean<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Central America<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n North America<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n South America<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Access to Information<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Access to Justice<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Climate Change<\/span>\n\n Advisory opinions<\/span>\n Greenhouse gases<\/span>\n Mitigation<\/span>\n Pivotal Cases<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Courts<\/span>\n\n International courts and tribunals<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Defending Defenders<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Economics<\/span>\n\n Ecosystem Services<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Environmental justice<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Human Rights<\/span>\n\n Inter-American human rights system<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n International Treaties<\/span>\n\n United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Procedural Issues<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Right to ...<\/span>\n\n Healthy Environment<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Rights of Nature<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Greenpeace Netherlands v. The State of the Netherlands, Case number: C\/09\/659832 \/ HA ZA 24-53 (28 January 2026), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2026:1344<\/a><\/div>
\n\n
\n Caribbean<\/span>\n\n Caribbean Netherlands<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Access to Justice<\/span>\n\n Attorney fees and costs<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Climate Change<\/span>\n\n Adaptation<\/span>\n Mitigation<\/span>\n Pivotal Cases<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Marine and Coastal<\/span>\n\n Coral reefs<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Pr\u00e1cticas de abogac\u00eda ind\u00edgena en Brasil \/Indigenous Lawyering Practices in Brazil<\/a><\/div>
\n\n
\n South America<\/span>\n\n Brazil<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Access to Justice<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Indigenous Peoples<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\"Indigenous<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Evaluations of Environmental Impact Assessment of Jamshoro Power Generation Project, October 2013, Addendum to Environmental Impact Assessment, Jamshoro Power Generation Project, October 2024 (30 April 2026)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n Caribbean<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Access to Information<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Sentencia 07294-1998, Sala Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Costa Rica (13 de Octubre del 1998)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n Central America<\/span>\n\n Costa Rica<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Constitutions<\/span>\n\n Right to Healthy Environment<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Forests<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Protected Areas<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
The Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Costa Rica considered a request to declare Article 71 of the Forestry Law unconstitutional.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Tata Housing Development Auth. v. Aalok Jagga, Civ. App. Nos. 8398-8399 of 2019 (5 November 2019)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n South Asia<\/span>\n\n India<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Biodiversity<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Protected Areas<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Public Trust Doctrine<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Wildlife<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
In Tata Housing Development Auth. v. Aalok Jagga, the Supreme Court of India halted a large-scale residential housing development proposed within a buffer zone of a wildlife sanctuary in the state of Punjab.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Clorox Australia Pty Limited [2025] FCA 357 (April 14, 2025)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n Pacific<\/span>\n\n Australia<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Plastic<\/span>\n\n Cases<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) alleged violations of provisions of the Australian Consumer Law when Clorox represented that kitchen tidy bags and garbage bags were made of 50% recycled plastic waste collected from the ocean or sea.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Decision 28\/1994. on environmental protection, Constitutional Court of Hungary (May 1994)<\/a><\/div>
1970<\/span>\n\n
\n Central and Eastern Europe<\/span>\n\n Hungary<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Protected Areas<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Right to ...<\/span>\n\n Healthy Environment<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
Case 28\/1994 (V.20) in the Constitutional Court of Hungary addressed reductions in protection of land. <\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
ASEAN Declaration on the Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment<\/a><\/div>
\n\n
\n Southeast Asia<\/span>\n\n Brunei Darussalam<\/span>\n Cambodia<\/span>\n Indonesia<\/span>\n Laos<\/span>\n Malaysia<\/span>\n Myanmar<\/span>\n Philippines<\/span>\n Singapore<\/span>\n Thailand<\/span>\n Viet Nam<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Access to Information<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Access to Justice<\/span>\n\n ASEAN Declaration<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Greenpeace Netherlands v. Netherlands, C\/09\/659832 \/ HA ZA 24-53 (28 January 2026)<\/a><\/div>
\n\n
\n Caribbean<\/span>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Western Europe<\/span>\n\n Netherlands<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n
\n Climate Change<\/span>\n\n Adaptation<\/span>\n Advisory opinions<\/span>\n Litigation<\/span>\n Mitigation<\/span>\n Pivotal Cases<\/span>\n United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Human Rights<\/span>\n\n European Court of Human Rights<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n