{"id":57614,"date":"2025-09-19T14:14:25","date_gmt":"2025-09-19T22:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/?post_type=resource&#038;p=57614"},"modified":"2025-09-19T14:14:26","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T22:14:26","slug":"d-g-khan-cement-company-v-government-of-punjab-supreme-court-of-pakistan-2019","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/resource\/d-g-khan-cement-company-v-government-of-punjab-supreme-court-of-pakistan-2019","title":{"rendered":"DG Khan Cement Company contra el Gobierno de Punjab, Tribunal Supremo de Pakist\u00e1n (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El Tribunal Supremo de Pakist\u00e1n reconoci\u00f3 la necesidad de otorgar personalidad jur\u00eddica a las entidades naturales en una sentencia de 2019. Una empresa cementera impugn\u00f3 al Gobierno Provincial de Punjab una notificaci\u00f3n que prohib\u00eda la construcci\u00f3n de nuevas plantas de cemento y la expansi\u00f3n de las existentes en zonas ambientalmente sensibles. El Tribunal determin\u00f3 que la protecci\u00f3n constitucional de los derechos fundamentales de la poblaci\u00f3n exig\u00eda la protecci\u00f3n del medio ambiente, y que \u00abel medio ambiente debe ser protegido por derecho propio\u00bb. <em>Identificaci\u00f3n.<\/em> en la p\u00e1g. 12. El Tribunal explic\u00f3:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Proteger la naturaleza implica mucho m\u00e1s que un r\u00e9gimen de derechos centrado en el ser humano. Vemos que legislaturas y tribunales de todo el mundo le han atribuido a la naturaleza elementos de personalidad. El enfoque de personificar el medio ambiente para proteger y preservar la naturaleza y sus objetos es una de las \u00faltimas evoluciones del derecho ambiental. El ser humano y su entorno deben llegar a acuerdos para el bien com\u00fan, y esta coexistencia pac\u00edfica exige que la ley trate a los objetos ambientales como titulares de derechos.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00a0<em>Identificaci\u00f3n.<\/em> en las p\u00e1gs. 12-13. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El Tribunal confirm\u00f3 la decisi\u00f3n del gobierno y dictamin\u00f3 que la empresa cementera no pod\u00eda ampliar sus instalaciones.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>*Nota: Las traducciones son autom\u00e1ticas, por lo que cualquier cita traducida debe cotejarse con el idioma original*<\/strong><br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court of Pakistan acknowledged the necessity to grant legal personality to natural entities in this 2019 ruling. A cement company challenged the Provincial Government of Punjab for a notification barring construction of new cement plants and expansion of existing plants in environmentally sensitive areas. The Court found that the constitutional protection of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[246,76,30482],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[],"region":[694,542],"class_list":["post-57614","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-cement-plants","resource-topic-pollution-industrial","resource-topic-rights-of-nature","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","region-pakistan","region-south-asia"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/57614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=57614"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=57614"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=57614"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=57614"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=57614"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}