{"id":53682,"date":"2024-05-31T15:22:20","date_gmt":"2024-05-31T23:22:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/?post_type=resource&#038;p=53682"},"modified":"2024-05-31T15:22:23","modified_gmt":"2024-05-31T23:22:23","slug":"mussington-v-development-control-authority-2024-ukpc-3-privy-council-appeal-no-0116-of-2021","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/resource\/mussington-v-development-control-authority-2024-ukpc-3-privy-council-appeal-no-0116-of-2021","title":{"rendered":"Mussington v. Development Control Authority [2024] UKPC 3, Privy Council Appeal No 0116 of 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El caso involucraba una impugnaci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n judicial de la decisi\u00f3n de planificaci\u00f3n emitida para un aeropuerto en la isla de Barbuda realizada sin el beneficio de una EIA adecuada y la participaci\u00f3n del p\u00fablico. Un tribunal inferior desestim\u00f3 el caso por falta de legitimaci\u00f3n activa bas\u00e1ndose en que el peticionario, John Mussington, era simplemente un \u201centrometido\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jcpc.uk\/cases\/docs\/jcpc-2021-0116-judgment.pdf\">Consejo privado <\/a>critic\u00f3 el enfoque estrecho y restringido del tribunal inferior sobre la legitimaci\u00f3n activa, declarando:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cuando una solicitud de revisi\u00f3n judicial involucra cuestiones de inter\u00e9s ambiental, no es necesario que el solicitante demuestre experiencia en el tema. Todo lo que se requiere es que demuestren alg\u00fan conocimiento o preocupaci\u00f3n por el tema. Por lo tanto, un ornit\u00f3logo u observador de aves aficionado podr\u00eda expresar su preocupaci\u00f3n por la posible p\u00e9rdida del h\u00e1bitat de un ave; o un pescador sobre el efecto de un proyecto hidroel\u00e9ctrico en los peces; o un historiador local sobre el efecto en un sitio arqueol\u00f3gico o hist\u00f3rico; o un residente local por la p\u00e9rdida de un lugar de belleza local frecuentado por la comunidad local. En Walton, Lord Hope, de hecho, plante\u00f3 la pregunta ret\u00f3rica: &quot;\u00bfQui\u00e9n habla en nombre de las \u00e1guilas pescadoras?&quot;. La respuesta es quien pueda demostrar un inter\u00e9s genuino en su destino. <\/p>\n<cite>Paraca. 57<\/cite><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case involved a judicial review challenge to the planning decision issued for an airport on the island of Barbuda conducted without the benefit of proper EIA and public participation. A lower court dismissed the case for lack of standing on the ground that the petitioner, John Mussington, was merely a \u201cbusybody.\u201d The Privy Council [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[35,127],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30103],"region":[1996,533],"class_list":["post-53682","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-access-to-justice","resource-topic-standing","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-notable-cases","region-antigua-and-barbuda","region-caribbean"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/53682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=53682"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=53682"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=53682"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=53682"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=53682"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}