Him Jagriti Uttaranchal Welfare Society v. India, n.\u00ba 15\/2014, Tribunal Ecol\u00f3gico Nacional (Tribunal Principal) (31 de mayo de 2019)<\/p>\n
En 2019, el tribunal de Nueva Delhi del Tribunal Verde Nacional revis\u00f3 el historial procesal de un caso que planteaba preocupaciones ambientales y de salud relacionadas con el uso de pl\u00e1stico y que ha estado en curso desde 2014. La Sociedad de Bienestar Him Jagriti Uttaranchal present\u00f3 el caso solicitando \u00f3rdenes. restringir el uso de botellas de pl\u00e1stico y envases de pl\u00e1stico multicapa. El solicitante present\u00f3 pruebas que demuestran que el uso de pl\u00e1sticos, incluidas las botellas de tereftalato de polietileno (PET) y el pl\u00e1stico multicapa, tiene un impacto adverso en la salud humana y el medio ambiente. Him Jagriti Uttaranchal Welfare Society v. Union of India & Ors., OA n.\u00ba 15 de 2014 (Tribunal Verde Nacional, Sala Principal) (31 de mayo de 2019), p\u00e1rr. 1. El Tribunal reconoci\u00f3 que el gobierno ha tomado algunas medidas para abordar el problema, pero el solicitante afirma que el gobierno s\u00f3lo ha abordado una parte del problema. En esta orden del 31 de mayo de 2019, el Tribunal orden\u00f3 que un Comit\u00e9 de Expertos compuesto por representantes de agencias gubernamentales se reuniera para examinar si se requieren restricciones adicionales sobre el uso de pl\u00e1stico en los envases. Identificaci\u00f3n. Paraca. 8. Al comit\u00e9 se le dieron tres meses para preparar un informe para el Tribunal. Identificaci\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Him Jagriti Uttaranchal Welfare Society v. India, No. 15\/2014, National Green Tribunal (Principal Bench) (31 May 2019) In 2019, the New Delhi bench of the National Green Tribunal reviewed the procedural history for a case raising environmental and health concerns related to the use of plastic that has been on-going since 2014. The Him Jagriti […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[1989],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30105],"region":[689,542],"class_list":["post-15740","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-plastic","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-plastic","region-india","region-south-asia"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/15740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=15740"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=15740"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=15740"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=15740"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=15740"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}