{"id":12612,"date":"2016-10-25T14:12:31","date_gmt":"2016-10-25T22:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/karabiga-cenal-power-station\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T11:43:21","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T19:43:21","slug":"tr-karabiga-cenal-2014","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/resource\/tr-karabiga-cenal-2014","title":{"rendered":"Central el\u00e9ctrica Karabiga-Cenal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[ELAW seeks a copy of this court decision.]<\/p>\n<p>News articles report&nbsp;a company proposing to construct a coal-fired power plant near Karabiga, Turkey, attempted to disguise the severe environmental and cumulative impacts of the proposed project by preparing four separate EIAs, rather than a single EIA.&nbsp; Each of these EIAs was approved by environmental officials; however, a Turkish administrative court rejected this approach and declared that the project proponent must prepare one EIA disclosing all of the impacts of the coal-fired power plant in its entirety.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The case is described in the following news article, dated November 26, 2014:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hurriyetdailynews.com\/istanbul-airport-contractor-gets-new-setback-on-coal-plant-project.aspx?pageID=238&#038;nID=74853&#038;NewsCatID=340\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.hurriyetdailynews.com\/istanbul-airport-contractor-gets-new-setback-on-coal-plant-project.aspx?pageID=238&#038;nID=74853&#038;NewsCatID=340<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ELAW seeks a copy of this court decision.] News articles report&nbsp;a company proposing to construct a coal-fired power plant near Karabiga, Turkey, attempted to disguise the severe environmental and cumulative impacts of the proposed project by preparing four separate EIAs, rather than a single EIA.&nbsp; Each of these EIAs was approved by environmental officials; however, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[190,61],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30102],"region":[538,636],"class_list":["post-12612","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-coal-and-gas-power-plants","resource-topic-energy","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-coal","region-middle-east-and-north-africa","region-turkey"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/12612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=12612"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=12612"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=12612"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=12612"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=12612"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}