AF Akpan contra Royal Dutch Shell, plc
\nE. Dooh contra Royal Dutch Shell, plc
\nFA Oguru contra Royal Dutch Shell plc<\/p>\n
Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n de La Haya (18 de diciembre de 2015)<\/p>\n
Los agricultores nigerianos y Amigos de la Tierra presentaron demandas contra Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) y sus filiales nigerianas ante un tribunal holand\u00e9s en busca de indemnizaci\u00f3n por los da\u00f1os supuestamente causados por fugas en oleoductos y en un pozo petrolero en Nigeria. Al anular una decisi\u00f3n de un tribunal inferior, el Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n de La Haya dictamin\u00f3 que los tribunales holandeses tienen competencia para considerar las reclamaciones. Tambi\u00e9n orden\u00f3 a Shell que proporcionara a los demandantes acceso a los documentos relacionados con los derrames de petr\u00f3leo. <\/p>\n
Se puede acceder a las opiniones, en holand\u00e9s, en los siguientes enlaces:<\/p>\n
http:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3586 (Dooh)<\/a> A.F. Akpan v. Royal Dutch Shell, plc E. Dooh v. Royal Dutch Shell, plc F.A. Oguru v. Royal Dutch Shell plc Court of Appeal of the Hague (December 18, 2015) Nigerian farmers and Friends of the Earth filed cases against Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) and its Nigerian subsidiaries in a Dutch court seeking compensation for damage […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[35,63,91],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30103],"region":[766,544],"class_list":["post-12329","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-access-to-justice","resource-topic-environmental-justice","resource-topic-oil-gas","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-notable-cases","region-netherlands","region-western-europe"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/12329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=12329"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=12329"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nhttp:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3587 <\/a>; (Akpan)
\nhttp:\/\/uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl\/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3588 (Oguru)<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"