{"id":11870,"date":"2016-01-27T12:15:47","date_gmt":"2016-01-27T20:15:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/ms-westerhaven-schiffahrts-et-al-v-attorney-general-belize-civil-appeal-19-2010-16-may-2011-court\/"},"modified":"2026-05-30T12:18:03","modified_gmt":"2026-05-30T20:18:03","slug":"bz_westerhaven_2011","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/resource\/bz_westerhaven_2011","title":{"rendered":"MS Westerhaven Schiffahrts et al. contra Fiscal General de Belice, Apelaci\u00f3n Civil 19 de 2010 (16 de mayo de 2011) (Tribunal de Apelaciones de Belice)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n de Belice revis\u00f3 una decisi\u00f3n de un tribunal inferior y limit\u00f3 la responsabilidad de los propietarios del MS Westerhaven por da\u00f1os al arrecife bas\u00e1ndose en la aplicaci\u00f3n del Convenio sobre limitaci\u00f3n de responsabilidad en reclamaciones mar\u00edtimas (Convenio LLMC). Aunque el tribunal inferior determin\u00f3 que la responsabilidad de los propietarios del buque era BZ$11.510.000, el Tribunal de Apelaciones concluy\u00f3 que el Convenio limitaba la responsabilidad a US$2.009.347 (seg\u00fan el tama\u00f1o del buque involucrado).&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of Appeal of Belize reviewed a lower court decision and limited the liability of the owners of the MS Westerhaven for damage to the reef&nbsp;based on application of the Convention on Limitation of Liability in Maritime Claims (LLMC Convention)&nbsp;.&nbsp; Although the lower court found the ship owners\u2019 liability to be BZ$11,510,000, the Court [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","resource-topic":[54,44],"resource-type":[528],"resource-category":[30097],"content-for-websites":[30100],"region":[567,534],"class_list":["post-11870","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-topic-financial-liability","resource-topic-marine-and-coastal","resource-type-cases","resource-category-legal","content-for-websites-caribbean","region-belize","region-central-america"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/11870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-topic?post=11870"},{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=11870"},{"taxonomy":"resource-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-category?post=11870"},{"taxonomy":"content-for-websites","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-for-websites?post=11870"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=11870"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}