{"id":19319,"date":"2020-09-09T08:57:47","date_gmt":"2020-09-09T16:57:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/madras-high-court-delivers-double-blow-notorious-polluter-vedanta-sterlite\/"},"modified":"2024-12-31T11:48:15","modified_gmt":"2024-12-31T19:48:15","slug":"madras-hcourt-delivers-blow-polluter-vedanta-sterlite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/madras-hcourt-delivers-blow-polluter-vedanta-sterlite","title":{"rendered":"El Tribunal Superior de Madr\u00e1s asesta un doble golpe al notorio contaminador Vedanta-Sterlite"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-image stk-block-image stk-block stk-5661aee\" data-block-id=\"5661aee\"><style>.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:221px !important;height:295px !important}@media screen and (max-width:999px){.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:250px !important}}@media screen and (max-width:689px){.stk-5661aee .stk-img-wrapper{width:250px !important}}<\/style><figure><span class=\"stk-img-wrapper stk-image--shape-stretch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"stk-img wp-image-52929\" src=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-scaled.jpg\" width=\"1920\" height=\"2560\" srcset=\"https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-scaled.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-336x448.jpg 336w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-771x1028.jpg 771w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-768x1024.jpg 768w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/elaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Madras-High-Court-9x12.jpg 9w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/span><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El Tribunal Superior de Madr\u00e1s deneg\u00f3 la petici\u00f3n de Sterlite Copper de reabrir su planta, cuyo cierre se orden\u00f3 en 2018. El tribunal tambi\u00e9n declar\u00f3 a la empresa responsable de una desastrosa fuga de di\u00f3xido de azufre (SO2) en 2013 que afect\u00f3 a miles de residentes en Thoothukudi, una ciudad portuaria en la Golfo de Mannar en Tamil Nadu. Sterlite es una unidad del conglomerado minero global Vedanta Ltd. Los procedimientos del Tribunal Superior marcaron un momento clave en la larga lucha de la comunidad contra Sterlite. El Tribunal Superior critic\u00f3 a Sterlite y al TNPCB por no garantizar que se estableciera una zona de amortiguamiento de tama\u00f1o adecuado (cintur\u00f3n verde) alrededor de la instalaci\u00f3n y se plantaran suficientes \u00e1rboles. Los cinturones verdes son tan importantes, seg\u00fan el Tribunal, que las autoridades habr\u00edan estado justificadas para cerrar la planta de Sterlite bas\u00e1ndose \u00fanicamente en que la empresa no manten\u00eda una zona de amortiguamiento. Lo m\u00e1s importante es que la decisi\u00f3n del Tribunal Superior refuerza un tema que recorre d\u00e9cadas de jurisprudencia india: el medio ambiente debe protegerse para las generaciones futuras.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El Tribunal Superior de Madr\u00e1s rechaz\u00f3 una petici\u00f3n de Sterlite Copper para reabrir su planta, cuyo cierre se orden\u00f3 en 2019 debido a problemas de zonificaci\u00f3n.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":52929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856],"tags":[30094],"region":[],"class_list":["post-19319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin","tag-news"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19319"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56331,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19319\/revisions\/56331"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19319"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elaw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=19319"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}