South Asia

BELA v. Ministry of Agriculture and others, Writ Petition No. 14614 of 2019 (High Court Division of the Supreme Court) (5 January 2020)

Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Assoc. v. Ministry of Agriculture and others, Writ Petition No. 14614 of 2019 (5 January 2020)
Supreme Court of Bangladesh - High Court Division

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Ashgar Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan

Ashgar Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan (W.P. No. 25501/2015)
Lahore High Court Green Bench

A farmer filed a public interest litigation alleging the government of Pakistan’s inaction and delay in implementing the National Climate Change Policy and addressing vulnerabilities associated with climate change violates the fundamental constitutional rights to life and dignity. 

In its first order, issued 4 September 2015, the Green Bench declared:

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Writ Petition No. 30237 of 2018 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition No. 35289 of 2018, Madras High Court, 19.11.2018

The Madras High Court determined that the operator of a coal-fired power plant isn't beneficially utilizing fly ash, as required by the fly ash utilization notification of 03/11/2009, among other regulatory violations, which are causing environmental degradation and health hazards that may result in irreparable loss.  Accordingly, the court ordered an ad-interim injunction restraining the operator from dumping material that would affect the marsh land in Vallur Village, Tamil Nadu. 

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Sunil Dahiya v. Union of India, Orig. App. No. 315 of 2016 (17 January 2018) (National Green Tribunal New Delhi)

 

Petitioners asked the National Green Tribunal to require the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change to implement restrictions on water consumption and emissions adopted in 2015 for new thermal power plants.  The Ministry had requested the Supreme Court grant an extension on the required timeline for implementing the regulation. 

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Salim v. State of Uttarakhand, Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of 2014 (December 5, 2016 and March 20, 2017)

Salim v. State of Uttarakhand, Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of 2014 (December 5, 2016 and March 20, 2017)
High Court of Uttarakhand

NOTE:  In July 2017, the Supreme Court of India issued a stay of the High Court’s order.  The appeal has not yet been decided.

*   *   *

Mohammed Salim filed public interest litigation in the High Court of Uttarakhand concerning illegal construction and encroachments along the Ganges River, as well as the failure to constitute the Ganga Management Board, as required by the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000.

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Lungowe v. Vendanta Resources PLC

Lungowe v. Vendanta Resources PLC [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC) (May 7, 2016)
England and Wales High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

More than 1,800 residents of four Zambian communities near the Nchanga copper mine brought an action in the UK against Vendanta Resources (Vendanta) and Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) for harm arising out of pollution and environmental damage caused by mining operations. 

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Pages

Subscribe to South Asia