South America

Rol No. 55.203-2016 (Mina Invierno case), Supreme Court of Chile (2017)

A mining company (Mina Invierno) proposed a project to incorporate blasting methods at an existing permitted open pit coal mine in southern Chile.  Citizens and civil society organizations properly presented petitions for the provision of citizen participation procedures during the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process required for this proposed complementary project, but those petitions were denied.  The denial of those petitions was unsuccessfully appealed at the administrative level and the proposed project to incorporate blasting was approved, so a constitutional lawsuit (re

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

REsp 647.493/SC [MPF v. Brazil and mining companies]

REsp 647.493/SC [MPF v. Brazil and mining companies] (22 May 2007):

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Sindicato de Trabajadores Independientes Procesadoras de Productos del Mar del Borde Costero Caleta Lo Rojas y otros c/ Central Termoeléctrica Bocamina I y II de ENDESA Chile S.A

Sindicato de Trabajadores Independientes Procesadoras de Productos del Mar del Borde Costero Caleta Lo Rojas y otros c/ Central Termoeléctrica Bocamina I y II de ENDESA Chile S. A., Rol No. 9852-2013, Supreme Court of Chile (2014) (decided on 9 January 2014, revised 6 November 2014): 

https://microjuriscl.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/mjch_mjj36617.pdf

 

Undefined
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Alberto Castilla c/ Estado de Colombia

Sentence C-035/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia (Alberto Castilla et al v. Colombia)

Citizens presented constitutional claims against several provisions of the laws that approved the 2010-2014 National Development Plan (Law 1450 of 2011) and the 2014-2018 National Development Plan (Law 1753 of 2015).  

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Giustiniani, Rubén Héctor v. Y.P.F. S.A

Giustiniani, Rubén Héctor v. Y.P.F. S.A  (November 10, 2015)
Supreme Court of Argentina 

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Kansol S.A. y Roswell Company S.A. c/ La Ley No. 5194

Kansol S.A. y Roswell Company S.A. c/ La Ley No. 5194 Que Declara de Interest Social y Expropria a Favor del Institute Paraguayo del Indigena (INDI), Año 2014 No, 797
Paraguay Supreme Court 

Law 5194/14 (promulgated June 11, 2014) expropriated land from two ranching companies and restored ownership to an indigenous community (Comunidad Indigena Sawhoyamaxa del Pueblo Enxet). The ranching companies (Kansol S.A. and Roswell Company S.A.) brought legal action to challenge the constitutionality of Law 5194/14.

English
Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Pages

Subscribe to South America